Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Kampholophos
Taxonomy
Kampholophos was named by Rensberger (1969) [Carroll (1988) introduced this misspelling of Kampholophos. Sepkoski's age data: T Mi-m Sepkoski's reference number: 746]. Its type is Kampholophos serrulus. It was considered monophyletic by Marx et al. (2016).
It was assigned to Iniidae by Rensberger (1969); to Odontoceti by Barnes (1977); to Kampholophinae by Barnes (1985), Ichishima et al. (1995) and McKenna and Bell (1997); to Cetacea by Sepkoski (2002); to Kentriodontinae by de Muizon (1988), Dawson (1996), Fordyce and de Muizon (2001), Lambert et al. (2005), Kazár and Hampe (2014) and Marx et al. (2016); and to Kentriodontidae by Carroll (1988), Benton (1993), Uhen et al. (2008), Berta (2017) and Peredo et al. (2018).
It was assigned to Iniidae by Rensberger (1969); to Odontoceti by Barnes (1977); to Kampholophinae by Barnes (1985), Ichishima et al. (1995) and McKenna and Bell (1997); to Cetacea by Sepkoski (2002); to Kentriodontinae by de Muizon (1988), Dawson (1996), Fordyce and de Muizon (2001), Lambert et al. (2005), Kazár and Hampe (2014) and Marx et al. (2016); and to Kentriodontidae by Carroll (1988), Benton (1993), Uhen et al. (2008), Berta (2017) and Peredo et al. (2018).
Species
Synonymy list
Year | Name and author |
---|---|
1969 | Kampholophos Rensberger |
1977 | Kampholophos Barnes p. 327 |
1985 | Kampholophos Barnes p. 25 |
1988 | Kampholophus Carroll |
1988 | Kampholophos de Muizon p. 162 |
1993 | Kampholophus Benton p. 762 |
1995 | Kampholophos Ichishima et al. p. 487 |
1996 | Kampholophos Dawson p. 132 |
1997 | Kampholophus McKenna and Bell p. 388 |
2001 | Kampholophos Fordyce and de Muizon p. 179 |
2002 | Kampholophus Sepkoski |
2005 | Kampholophos Lambert et al. p. 240 |
2008 | Kampholophos Uhen et al. p. 588 |
2014 | Kampholophos Kazár and Hampe p. 1217 |
2016 | Kampholophos Marx et al. p. 134 |
2017 | Kampholophos Berta p. 163 |
2018 | Kampholophos Peredo et al. p. 2 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available