| Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
| Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Salumiphocaena
Taxonomy
Salumiphocaena was named by Barnes (1985). It was considered monophyletic by Uhen et al. (2008).
It was corrected as Salumniphocaena by Carroll (1988), Sepkoski (2002) and Murakami et al. (2014).
It was assigned to Phocaenidae by Carroll (1988); to Phocoenoidinae by Barnes (1985), de Muizon (1988) and McKenna and Bell (1997); to Cetacea by Sepkoski (2002); and to Phocoenidae by Benton (1993), Fajardo-Mellor et al. (2006), Uhen et al. (2008), Murakami et al. (2014), Colpaert et al. (2015), Marx et al. (2016) and Berta (2017).
It was corrected as Salumniphocaena by Carroll (1988), Sepkoski (2002) and Murakami et al. (2014).
It was assigned to Phocaenidae by Carroll (1988); to Phocoenoidinae by Barnes (1985), de Muizon (1988) and McKenna and Bell (1997); to Cetacea by Sepkoski (2002); and to Phocoenidae by Benton (1993), Fajardo-Mellor et al. (2006), Uhen et al. (2008), Murakami et al. (2014), Colpaert et al. (2015), Marx et al. (2016) and Berta (2017).
Species
Synonymy list
| Year | Name and author |
|---|---|
| 1985 | Salumiphocaena Barnes p. 157 |
| 1988 | Salumniphocaena Carroll |
| 1988 | Salumiphocaena de Muizon p. 162 |
| 1993 | Salumiphocaena Benton p. 762 |
| 1997 | Salumiphocaena McKenna and Bell p. 390 |
| 2002 | Salumniphocaena Sepkoski |
| 2006 | Salumiphocaena Fajardo-Mellor et al. p. 927 |
| 2008 | Salumiphocaena Uhen et al. p. 591 |
| 2014 | Salumniphocaena Murakami et al. p. 502 figs. Figure 7 |
| 2015 | Salumiphocaena Colpaert et al. p. 9 figs. Figure 8 |
| 2016 | Salumiphocaena Marx et al. p. 139 |
| 2017 | Salumiphocaena Berta p. 165 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available