| Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
| Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Ruedemannia trilix
Taxonomy
Pleurotomaria trilix was named by Hall (1862). It is not a trace fossil.
It was recombined as Lophospira trilix by Ulrich and Scofield (1897), Grabau and Shimer (1909); it was recombined as Bembexia trilix by Knight and Bridge (1944); it was recombined as Ruedemannia trilix by Campbell and Engel (1963), Rollins et al. (1971), Gubanov et al. (1995), Wagner (2023).
It was recombined as Lophospira trilix by Ulrich and Scofield (1897), Grabau and Shimer (1909); it was recombined as Bembexia trilix by Knight and Bridge (1944); it was recombined as Ruedemannia trilix by Campbell and Engel (1963), Rollins et al. (1971), Gubanov et al. (1995), Wagner (2023).
Synonyms
|
Synonymy list
| Year | Name and author |
|---|---|
| 1862 | Pleurotomaria trilix Hall p. 45 |
| 1879 | Pleurotomaria trilix Hall p. 79 figs. pl. 21 f. 13-15 |
| 1897 | Lophospira trilix Ulrich and Scofield p. 964 |
| 1909 | Lophospira trilix Grabau and Shimer p. 637 figs. f. 684 |
| 1909 | Pleurotomaria sciotoensis Stauffer p. 194 figs. pl. 17 f. 5-6 |
| 1944 | Bembexia trilix Knight and Bridge p. 457 figs. pl. 184 f. 27-28 |
| 1963 | Ruedemannia trilix Campbell and Engel p. 93 |
| 1971 | Ruedemannia trilix Rollins et al. pp. 147 - 149 figs. f. 9a-c |
| 1995 | Ruedemannia sciotoensis Gubanov et al. p. 434 |
| 1995 | Ruedemannia trilix Gubanov et al. p. 434 |
| 2023 | Ruedemannia trilix Wagner p. 2058 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
†Ruedemannia trilix Hall 1862
show all | hide all
Invalid names: Ruedemannia sciotoensis Stauffer 1909 [synonym]
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available