| Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
| Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Taxonomy
Gnathodon cuneatus was named by Sowerby (1831). It is extant.
It was misspelled as Gnathodon cuneatum by Cooke (1936); it was recombined as Rangia cuneata by Dall (1898), Abbott (1954), Richards (1962), Spencer and Campbell (1987), Petuch and Roberts (2007), Hendy et al. (2008).
It was misspelled as Gnathodon cuneatum by Cooke (1936); it was recombined as Rangia cuneata by Dall (1898), Abbott (1954), Richards (1962), Spencer and Campbell (1987), Petuch and Roberts (2007), Hendy et al. (2008).
Sister species lacking formal opinion data
Synonyms
|
Synonymy list
| Year | Name and author |
|---|---|
| 1831 | Gnathodon cuneatus Sowerby |
| 1858 | Gnathodon cuneatus Holmes p. 41 |
| 1884 | Gnathodon nasutus Dall |
| 1898 | Rangia cuneata Dall p. 904 |
| 1936 | Gnathodon cuneatum Cooke |
| 1954 | Rangia cuneata Abbott p. 450 |
| 1962 | Rangia nasuta DuBar |
| 1962 | Rangia cuneata Richards p. 69 |
| 1987 | Rangia cuneata Spencer and Campbell p. 47 |
| 2007 | Rangia cuneata Petuch and Roberts |
| 2008 | Rangia cuneata Hendy et al. |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available