Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Taxonomy
Kimula was named by Goodnight and Goodnight (1942). It is extant. It is the type genus of Kimulidae.
It was assigned to Kimulidae by Dunlop et al. (2013).
It was assigned to Kimulidae by Dunlop et al. (2013).
Synonymy list
Year | Name and author |
---|---|
1942 | Kimula Goodnight and Goodnight |
2013 | Kimula Dunlop et al. p. 45 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
G. Kimula Goodnight and Goodnight 1942
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available
Measurements
No measurements are available
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Source: c = class | |||||
Reference: Bush and Bambach 2015 |
Age range: base of the Burdigalian to the top of the Langhian or 20.44000 to 13.82000 Ma
Collections: one only
Time interval | Ma | Country or state | Original ID and collection number |
---|---|---|---|
Burdigalian - Langhian | Dominican Republic | K. sp. (140194) |