Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Aepinacodon rostratus
Taxonomy
Ancodus rostratus was named by Scott (1894).
It was recombined as Ancodon rostratus by Hay (1902), Matthew (1909) and Cook (1912); it was recombined as Hyopotamus rostratus by Matthew (1909) and O'Harra (1920); it was recombined as Aepinacodon rostratus by Troxell (1921), Macdonald (1956); it was recombined as Bothriodon rostratus by Trouessart (1905), Scott (1937), Scott (1940), Russell (1978), Kron and Manning (1998).
It was recombined as Ancodon rostratus by Hay (1902), Matthew (1909) and Cook (1912); it was recombined as Hyopotamus rostratus by Matthew (1909) and O'Harra (1920); it was recombined as Aepinacodon rostratus by Troxell (1921), Macdonald (1956); it was recombined as Bothriodon rostratus by Trouessart (1905), Scott (1937), Scott (1940), Russell (1978), Kron and Manning (1998).
Synonymy list
Year | Name and author |
---|---|
1894 | Ancodus rostratus Scott |
1902 | Ancodon rostratus Hay p. 653 |
1905 | Bothriodon rostratus Trouessart |
1909 | Hyopotamus rostratus Matthew |
1909 | Ancodon rostratus Matthew p. 1 |
1912 | Ancodon rostratus Cook |
1920 | Hyopotamus rostratus O'Harra |
1921 | Aepinacodon rostratus Troxell p. 334 |
1937 | Bothriodon rostratus Scott |
1940 | Bothriodon rostratus Scott p. 464 |
1956 | Aepinacodon rostratus Macdonald p. 621 |
1978 | Bothriodon rostratus Russell |
1998 | Bothriodon rostratus Kron and Manning |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
†Aepinacodon rostratus Scott 1894
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
Reference | Diagnosis | |
---|---|---|
J. R. Macdonald 1956 | M3 with wide open transverse valley; mesostyle deeply notched; hypocone larger than in other species. M2 similar to M3 but mesostyle not notched. P4 with heavy cingulum continuous around protocone. |
Measurements
No measurements are available
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Source: f = family, o = order, subc = subclass, c = class, subp = subphylum | |||||
References: Hendy et al. 2009, Carroll 1988, Nowak 1999, Lillegraven 1979, Kron and Manning 1998 |