Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Mesohippus westoni
Taxonomy
Anchitherium westoni was named by Cope (1889). Its type specimen is Ottawa Mus. 6289, a set of teeth (a single superior molar, and two inferior molars, the latter in place in a part of the mandible.), and it is a 3D body fossil.
It was recombined as Miohippus westonii by Hay (1902); it was considered a nomen dubium by Macdonald (1992); it was recombined as Mesohippus westoni by Roger (1896), Matthew (1899), Osborn (1904), Lambe (1905), Lambe (1908), Osborn (1918), Hay (1930), Stirton (1940), Scott (1941), Russell (1975), Prothero and Shubin (1989), Storer and Bryant (1993) and MacFadden (1998).
It was recombined as Miohippus westonii by Hay (1902); it was considered a nomen dubium by Macdonald (1992); it was recombined as Mesohippus westoni by Roger (1896), Matthew (1899), Osborn (1904), Lambe (1905), Lambe (1908), Osborn (1918), Hay (1930), Stirton (1940), Scott (1941), Russell (1975), Prothero and Shubin (1989), Storer and Bryant (1993) and MacFadden (1998).
Synonyms
|
Synonymy list
Year | Name and author |
---|---|
1889 | Anchitherium westoni Cope p. 153 |
1891 | Anchitherium westonii Cope p. 20 |
1896 | Mesohippus westoni Roger |
1899 | Mesohippus westoni Matthew |
1902 | Miohippus westonii Hay p. 614 |
1904 | Mesohippus montanensis Osborn |
1904 | Mesohippus westoni Osborn p. 168 |
1905 | Mesohippus westoni Lambe |
1905 | Mesohippus praecocidens Lambe p. 46 |
1908 | Mesohippus praecocidens Lambe |
1908 | Mesohippus westoni Lambe |
1918 | Mesohippus westoni Osborn p. 38 figs. Plate 2.10. Text Fig. 18 |
1918 | Mesohippus montanensis Osborn p. 39 figs. Plate 2.1. Text Fig. 20 |
1918 | Mesohippus praecocidens Osborn p. 42 figs. Text Fig. 24(14) |
1930 | Mesohippus westoni Hay |
1940 | Mesohippus montanensis Stirton p. 170 |
1940 | Mesohippus praecocidens Stirton p. 170 |
1940 | Mesohippus westoni Stirton p. 170 |
1941 | Mesohippus westoni Scott |
1975 | Mesohippus westoni Russell |
1989 | Mesohippus westoni Prothero and Shubin |
1993 | Mesohippus westoni Storer and Bryant |
1998 | Mesohippus westoni MacFadden p. 543 |
2001 | Mesohippus montanensis Tabrum et al. |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
†Mesohippus westoni Cope 1889
show all | hide all
Invalid names: Mesohippus montanensis Osborn 1904 [synonym], Mesohippus praecocidens Lambe 1905 [synonym]
Diagnosis
Reference | Diagnosis | |
---|---|---|
H. F. Osborn 1918 | Superior ex:tremely primitive and brachyodont; transverse diameter propor-
tionately great; crests low and obtuse; persistent, well defined internal cingulum; protoloph with defined protoconule; met!J.loph continuous, with metaconule somewhat less clearly defined; no hypostyle. | |
H. F. Osborn 1918 (Mesohippus montanensis) | (Osborn, 1904, p. 170)"Distinguished from M. celer by full size of m3 ; from M. westoni by sharp elevation of crests and absence of internal cingulum; from M. latidens by smaller parastyle and sub-equal length of protoloph and metaloph. Molars more quadrate in form than in M. latidens. Protoconule quite distinct in protoloph; metaconule well defined on base of metaloph. Hypostyle absent or extremely rudimentary. A fore foot associated with a single m3 of the same species exhibits a large splint of Mtc. v." | |
H. F. Osborn 1918 (Mesohippus praecocidens) | (Lambe, 1905) "This tooth is about the size of, or possibly smaller than, M. westoni, but is more progressive in every way. There is an entire absence of an internal cingulum, the cross crests are better developed and rela- tively higher with steeper slopes. The protoconule is relatively larger, and the metaconule, although defined, scarcely breaks the continuity of the metaloph which unites in a decided manner with the ectoloph. The protoconule is distinctly • defined in the protoloph and connects closely with the forward slope of the paracone. The hypocone has about the same height as the protocone. The anterior cingulum is strong." |
Measurements
No measurements are available
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Source: f = family, subc = subclass, c = class, subp = subphylum | |||||
References: Nowak 1991, Carroll 1988, Ji et al. 2002, Lillegraven 1979, Hendy et al. 2009 |
Age range: Chadronian or 37.20000 to 33.90000 Ma
Collections (10 total)
Time interval | Ma | Country or state | Original ID and collection number |
---|---|---|---|
Chadronian | USA (North Dakota) | Mesohippus westoni (16991) | |
Chadronian | Canada (Saskatchewan) | Anchitherium westonii (101961) Mesohippus sp. (17023) Mesohippus westoni (16893 16919) | |
Chadronian | USA (Wyoming) | Mesohippus montanensis (16920) Mesohippus westoni (17011) | |
Chadronian | USA (Montana) | Mesohippus montanensis (17010) Mesohippus westoni (16988) | |
Middle Chadronian | Canada (Saskatchewan) | Mesohippus westoni (16928) |