| Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
| Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Carinaropsis cunulae
Taxonomy
Carinaropsis (Phragmostoma) cunulae was named by Hall (1861) [Carinaropsis (Phragmostoma) cunulæ]. It is not a trace fossil.
It was recombined as Carinaropsis cunulae by Ulrich and Scofield (1897), Grabau and Shimer (1909), Wahlman (1992), Peel (1993), Wagner (2023).
It was recombined as Carinaropsis cunulae by Ulrich and Scofield (1897), Grabau and Shimer (1909), Wahlman (1992), Peel (1993), Wagner (2023).
Synonymy list
| Year | Name and author |
|---|---|
| 1861 | Carinaropsis (Phragmostoma) cunulae Hall |
| 1889 | Carinaropsis (Phragmostoma) cunulae Miller |
| 1897 | Carinaropsis cunulae Ulrich and Scofield |
| 1909 | Carinaropsis cunulae Grabau and Shimer p. 927 figs. pl. 62 f. 10-13 |
| 1992 | Carinaropsis cunulae Wahlman p. 178 figs. pl. 37 f. 12-14 |
| 1993 | Carinaropsis cunulae Peel pp. 529 - 533 figs. f. 2.1-13 |
| 2023 | Carinaropsis cunulae Wagner p. 237 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
†Carinaropsis cunulae Hall 1861
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available
Measurements
No measurements are available
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
| Source: g = genus, f = family, o = order, c = class | |||||
| References: Kiessling 2004, Knight et al. 1960, Hendy 2009 | |||||
Age range: Shermanian or 457.30000 to 449.60000 Ma
Collections: one only
| Time interval | Ma | Country or state | Original ID and collection number |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shermanian | USA (Tennessee) | Carinaropsis cunulae (154415) |