Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Osteopygis
Taxonomy
Osteopygis was named by Cope (1868) [Sepkoski's age data: K Camp-u T Eo Sepkoski's reference number: 987,1069]. Its type is Osteopygis emarginatus.
It was assigned to Chelydrinae by Cope (1870); to Propleuridae by Cope (1884); to Thalassemydidae by Hay (1902), Hay (1908), Hay (1930) and Bohlin (1953); to Toxochelyidae by Yeh (1963) and Carroll (1988); to Osteopyginae by Zangerl (1953), Foster (1980) and Weems (1988); to Cheloniidae by Hirayama (1995); to Chelonia by Sepkoski (2002); to Macrobaenidae by Parham (2005) and Brinkman et al. (2010); and to Macrobaenidae by Gentry et al. (2023).
It was assigned to Chelydrinae by Cope (1870); to Propleuridae by Cope (1884); to Thalassemydidae by Hay (1902), Hay (1908), Hay (1930) and Bohlin (1953); to Toxochelyidae by Yeh (1963) and Carroll (1988); to Osteopyginae by Zangerl (1953), Foster (1980) and Weems (1988); to Cheloniidae by Hirayama (1995); to Chelonia by Sepkoski (2002); to Macrobaenidae by Parham (2005) and Brinkman et al. (2010); and to Macrobaenidae by Gentry et al. (2023).
Synonymy list
Year | Name and author |
---|---|
1868 | Osteopygis Cope p. 147 |
1870 | Osteopygis Cope p. 132 |
1884 | Osteopygis Cope |
1902 | Osteopygis Hay p. 441 |
1908 | Osteopygis Hay p. 127 |
1930 | Osteopygis Hay p. 75 |
1953 | Osteopygis Bohlin p. 69 |
1953 | Osteopygis Zangerl p. 205 |
1963 | Osteopygis Yeh |
1980 | Osteopygis Foster |
1988 | Osteopygis Carroll |
1988 | Osteopygis Weems p. 115 |
1995 | Osteopygis Hirayama p. 282 |
2002 | Osteopygis Sepkoski |
2005 | Osteopygis Parham p. 76 |
2010 | Osteopygis Brinkman et al. |
2023 | Osteopygis Gentry et al. |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
G. †Osteopygis Cope 1868
show all | hide all
†Osteopygis backmani Russell 1934
†Osteopygis emarginata Cope 1868
†Osteopygis emarginatus Cope 1868
hide
Invalid names: Amblypeza entellus Hay 1908 [synonym], Catapleura chelydrina Cope 1875 [synonym], Osteopygis borealis Wieland 1904 [synonym], Osteopygis chelydrinus Cope 1868 [synonym], Osteopygis erosus Cope 1875 [synonym], Osteopygis gibbi Wieland 1904 [synonym], Osteopygis platylomus Cope 1870 [synonym], Osteopygis robustus Hay 1908 [synonym]
†Osteopygis kranzi Weems 2014
†Osteopygis russelli Brinkman 2015
Diagnosis
Reference | Diagnosis | |
---|---|---|
O. P. Hay 1908 | Carapace including 8 pairs of costal plates and 1 1 pairs of peripherals, with all or only a part of the peripherals suturally articulated with the costals and the suprapygals. All the costals sending the ends of their ribs into pits of the corresponding peripherals. Five vertebral and 4 pairs of costal scutes. The nuchal scute much wider than long. Plastron relatively small; its connection with the peripherals extensive, reaching from the second to the eighth peripherals, not by close sutures. Bridge relatively narrow. Fontanels in the midline and at the ends of the hyohypoplastral suture. Inframarginal scutes present. Lower jaw with a broad and flat crushing surface; not beakt. | |
B. Bohlin 1953 | Carapace including 8 pairs of costal plates and 11 pairs of peripherals, with all or only a part of the peripherals suturally articulated with the costals and the suprapygals. All the costals sending their ribs into pits of the corresponding peripherals. Five vertebral and 4 pairs of costal scutes. The nuchal scute much wider than long. Plastron relatively small; its connection with the peripherals extensive, reaching from the second to the eighth peripherals, not by closed sutures. Bridge relatively narrow. Fontanels in the midline and at the ends of the hyohypoplastral suture. Inframarginal scutes present. Lower jaw with a broad and flat crushing surface; not beaked. (Hay 1908 p. 127). | |
A. D. Gentry et al. 2023 | Osteopygis can be differentiated from A. ebersolei and J. sukhanovi by the presence of a central plastral fenestra and from A. gaffneyi in having an ovoid carapace that is longer than wide. |