| Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
| Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Actenomys
Taxonomy
Actenomys was named by Burmeister (1888). It is not extant.
It was assigned to Ctenomyidae by McKenna and Bell (1997); and to Ctenomyinae by Fernández et al. (2000) and Verzi et al. (2014).
It was assigned to Ctenomyidae by McKenna and Bell (1997); and to Ctenomyinae by Fernández et al. (2000) and Verzi et al. (2014).
Species
Synonyms
|
Synonymy list
| Year | Name and author |
|---|---|
| 1888 | Dicoelophorus Ameghino |
| 1888 | Actenomys Burmeister |
| 1914 | Dicoelophorus Rovereto p. 136 |
| 1997 | Actenomys McKenna and Bell |
| 2000 | Actenomys Fernández et al. p. 87 |
| 2014 | Actenomys Verzi et al. |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
G. †Actenomys Burmeister 1888
show all | hide all
†Actenomys priscus Owen 1840
Invalid names: Dicoelophorus Ameghino 1888 [nomen oblitum]
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available