Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Dorudon atrox
Discussion
http://eol.org/pages/4525672/overview
Taxonomy
Prozeuglodon atrox was named by Andrews (1906). Its type specimen is CGM 9319, a partial skeleton (partial juvenile skull and skeleton), and it is a 3D body fossil. Its type locality is Birket-el-Qurun beds, which is in a Priabonian coastal sandstone in the Birket Qarun Formation of Egypt.
It was synonymized subjectively with Zeuglodon isis by Zittel (1925); it was synonymized subjectively with Prozeuglodon isis by Kellogg (1936); it was recombined as Dorudon atrox by Uhen (1996), Uhen (1998), Uhen (2004), van Vliet (2004), Clementz et al. (2006), Bouetel and Muizon (2006), McLeod and Barnes (2008), Gingerich (2008), Uhen (2009), Fitzgerald (2010), Schouten (2011), Gingerich (2012), Gingerich (2013), Cioppi (2014), Gingerich and Cappetta (2014), Uhen (2018), Mahdy et al. (2019) and Zalmout et al. (2020).
It was synonymized subjectively with Zeuglodon isis by Zittel (1925); it was synonymized subjectively with Prozeuglodon isis by Kellogg (1936); it was recombined as Dorudon atrox by Uhen (1996), Uhen (1998), Uhen (2004), van Vliet (2004), Clementz et al. (2006), Bouetel and Muizon (2006), McLeod and Barnes (2008), Gingerich (2008), Uhen (2009), Fitzgerald (2010), Schouten (2011), Gingerich (2012), Gingerich (2013), Cioppi (2014), Gingerich and Cappetta (2014), Uhen (2018), Mahdy et al. (2019) and Zalmout et al. (2020).
Synonyms
|
Synonymy list
Year | Name and author |
---|---|
1906 | Prozeuglodon atrox Andrews pp. 255-257 figs. 80-83, Plate 21 |
1908 | Prozeuglodon atrox Stromer p. 5 |
1914 | Prozeuglodon atrox Abel p. 220 |
1923 | Zeuglodon intermedius Dart p. 629 |
1928 | Prozeuglodon stromeri Kellogg p. 40 |
1936 | Dorudon stromeri Kellogg p. 203 |
1936 | Dorudon intermedius Kellogg p. 222 |
1970 | Prozeuglodon atrox Mchedlidze p. 50 |
1990 | Prozeuglodon atrox Gingerich et al. p. 156 |
1991 | Prozeuglodon atrox Gingerich p. 214 |
1992 | Dorudon stromeri Gingerich p. 73 |
1996 | Dorudon atrox Uhen p. 51 |
1998 | Dorudon atrox Uhen p. 36 |
2004 | Dorudon atrox Uhen p. 14 |
2004 | Dorudon atrox van Vliet p. 143 |
2004 | Dorudon intermedius van Vliet p. 143 |
2004 | Dorudon stromeri van Vliet p. 143 |
2006 | Dorudon atrox Bouetel and Muizon p. 383 |
2006 | Dorudon atrox Clementz et al. p. 359 |
2008 | Dorudon atrox Gingerich p. 109 figs. Table 1 |
2008 | Dorudon stromeri Gingerich p. 109 figs. Table 1 |
2008 | Dorudon atrox McLeod and Barnes p. 93 |
2009 | Dorudon atrox Uhen p. 93 |
2010 | Dorudon atrox Fitzgerald p. 370 figs. Table 1 |
2011 | Dorudon atrox Schouten p. 18 |
2012 | Dorudon atrox Gingerich p. 313 figs. Figure 4 |
2013 | Dorudon atrox Gingerich |
2014 | Dorudon atrox Cioppi p. 86 |
2014 | Dorudon atrox Gingerich and Cappetta p. 128 figs. Figure 16 |
2018 | Dorudon atrox Uhen |
2019 | Dorudon atrox Mahdy et al. |
2020 | Dorudon atrox Zalmout et al. p. 128 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
†Dorudon atrox Andrews 1906
show all | hide all
Invalid names: Dorudon intermedius Dart 1923 [synonym], Dorudon stromeri Kellogg 1928 [synonym]
Diagnosis
Reference | Diagnosis | |
---|---|---|
M. D. Uhen 2004 | Dorudon atrox can be distinguished from all other archaeocetes by its unique conformation of cranial bones in the posterior narial region (see Figure 2.28). In D. atrox, the posterior nasals are separated by a long, thin process of the frontals. In addition, the medial edges of the posterior maxillae contact the lateral edges of the nasals. Both species of Basilosaurus have small narial processes of the frontals and the medial maxillae touch the nasals only. D. atrox is here placed in the genus Dorudon due to the similar size and morphology of the type specimen of Dorudon serratus to comparable specimens of D. atrox. Differences that distinguish D. atrox from Dorudon serratus include: the presence of three vs. two mesial accessory denticles on dP2; weaker mesial and distal cingula on the upper premolars; stronger vertical rib ornamentation on the upper premolars; and a weaker lingual projection (Andrew’s “postero-internal buttress” of D. atrox) and dP3 and dP4. |