Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Included Taxa
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Jurapteryx recurva

Reptilia

Taxonomy
Archaeopteryx recurva was named by Howgate (1984) [type is the Eichstätt specimen]. Its type specimen is JM 2257, a skeleton (complete skeleton), and it is a compression fossil. Its type locality is Workerszell, Eichstätt, which is in a Tithonian lagoonal/restricted shallow subtidal limestone in the Altmühltal Formation of Germany. It is the type species of Jurapteryx.

It was recombined as Jurapteryx recurva by Howgate (1985); it was synonymized subjectively with Archaeopteryx lithographica by Paul (1988), Senter and Robins (2003) and Padian (2004).

Synonymy list
YearName and author
1984Archaeopteryx recurva Howgate p. 172–173
1985Jurapteryx recurva Howgate p. 111

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
—Bilateria
—EubilateriaAx 1987
—Deuterostomia
phylumChordataHaeckel 1874
subphylumVertebrata
superclassGnathostomata
—Osteichthyes()
subclassSarcopterygii()
subclassDipnotetrapodomorpha(Nelson 2006)
subclassTetrapodomorpha()
—Tetrapoda
—Reptiliomorpha
—Anthracosauria
subclassAmphibiosauriaKuhn 1967
—Cotylosauria()
—Amniota
—Sauropsida
classReptilia
subclassEureptilia()
—Romeriida
RankNameAuthor
—Diapsida()
—Archosauromorpha(Huene 1946)
—Crocopoda
—ArchosauriformesGauthier 1986
—Eucrocopoda
—Archosauria()
informalAvemetatarsalia
—Ornithodira
—Dinosauromorpha
—Dinosauriformes
—Dinosauria()
—Theropoda()
—Neotheropoda
—AverostraPaul 2002
—Tetanurae
—Coelurosauria()
—Maniraptora
—Avialae
genusJurapteryx
speciesrecurva()

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

†Jurapteryx recurva Howgate 1984
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
ReferenceDiagnosis
M. E. Howgate 1984The following major differences serve to identify the new
species.
(1) The teeth are more gracile and recurved.
(2) The specimen is one-third smaller than the other specimens of Archaeopteryx.
(3) The distal elements of the pes are proportionately longer.
(4) The pubic symphysis is short.

The following more problematic differences, if confirmed, would serve to
establish a distinct genus for the Eichstatt specimen.
(5) The pubis is very slightly opisthopubic or vertical.
(6) The lack of an ossified furcula.
Measurements
No measurements are available
Composition: hydroxyapatiteo
Entire body: yeso
Adult length: 10 to < 100o
Adult width: 1.0 to < 10o
Adult height: 1.0 to < 10o
Architecture: compact or denseo
Ontogeny: accretion, modification of partso
Grouping: solitaryo
Environment: coastalg
Locomotion: actively mobileo
Life habit: volantg
Diet: piscivoreg
Diet 2: insectivoreg
Reproduction: oviparousg
Dispersal: direct/internalo
Dispersal 2: mobileo
Created: 2005-09-01 15:05:59
Modified: 2009-01-03 21:14:03
Source: g = genus, o = order
References: Thulborn and Hamley 1985, Marsh 1875

Age range: Early/Lower Tithonian or 150.80000 to 145.00000 Ma

Collections: one only


Time interval Ma Country or state Original ID and collection number
Early/Lower Tithonian150.8 - 145.0Germany (Bayern) Compsognathus sp. (type locality: 53039)