| Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
| Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Tsagantegia
Taxonomy
Tsagantegia was named by Tumanova (1993). Its type is Tsagantegia longicranialis. It was considered monophyletic by Vickaryous et al. (2004).
It was assigned to Shamosaurinae by Ford (2000); to Ankylosauridae by Tumanova (2000), Carpenter (2001), Lü et al. (2007), Parsons and Parsons (2009), Arbour et al. (2014) and Arbour et al. (2014); and to Ankylosaurinae by Tumanova (1993), Tumanova (1993), Vickaryous et al. (2001), Vickaryous et al. (2004), Han et al. (2014), Arbour and Currie (2016) and Yang et al. (2017).
It was assigned to Shamosaurinae by Ford (2000); to Ankylosauridae by Tumanova (2000), Carpenter (2001), Lü et al. (2007), Parsons and Parsons (2009), Arbour et al. (2014) and Arbour et al. (2014); and to Ankylosaurinae by Tumanova (1993), Tumanova (1993), Vickaryous et al. (2001), Vickaryous et al. (2004), Han et al. (2014), Arbour and Currie (2016) and Yang et al. (2017).
Species
T. longicranialis (type species)
Synonymy list
| Year | Name and author |
|---|---|
| 1993 | Tsagantegia Tumanova pp. 92-93 fig. 1 |
| 2000 | Tsagantegia Ford p. 176 |
| 2000 | Tsagantegia Tumanova p. 521 |
| 2001 | Tsagantegia Carpenter p. 457 |
| 2001 | Tsagantegia Vickaryous et al. p. 1774 |
| 2004 | Tsagantegia Vickaryous et al. p. 364 |
| 2007 | Tsagantegia Lü et al. p. 889 fig. 1 |
| 2009 | Tsagantegia Parsons and Parsons p. 736 fig. 18 |
| 2014 | Tsagantegia Arbour et al. p. 11 fig. 6 |
| 2014 | Tsagantegia Arbour et al. p. 648 |
| 2014 | Tsagantegia Han et al. p. 14 fig. 11 |
| 2016 | Tsagantegia Arbour and Currie p. 415 |
| 2017 | Tsagantegia Yang et al. p. 786 fig. 5 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available