| Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Relationships |
| Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | Age range and collections |
Dictyotomaria
Gastropoda - Murchisoniina - Gosseletinidae
Taxonomy
Dictyotomaria was named by Knight (1945) [Sepkoski's age data: D Eife Tr Ladi-u Sepkoski's reference number: 362,797,1120].
It was reranked as Glyptotomaria (Dictyotomaria) by Knight et al. (1960), Yochelson and Saunders (1967) and Hoare et al. (1997).
It was assigned to Glyptotomaria by Knight et al. (1960), Yochelson and Saunders (1967) and Hoare et al. (1997); to Archaeogastropoda by Sepkoski (2002); to Selenimorpha by Amler and Heidelberger (2003); to Zygitidae by Bandel (2009); and to Gosseletininae by Wagner (2017).
It was reranked as Glyptotomaria (Dictyotomaria) by Knight et al. (1960), Yochelson and Saunders (1967) and Hoare et al. (1997).
It was assigned to Glyptotomaria by Knight et al. (1960), Yochelson and Saunders (1967) and Hoare et al. (1997); to Archaeogastropoda by Sepkoski (2002); to Selenimorpha by Amler and Heidelberger (2003); to Zygitidae by Bandel (2009); and to Gosseletininae by Wagner (2017).
Species
D. capillaria (syn. D. procteri), D. carlbransoni, D. concinna, D. decora, D. depressus, D. ella, D. euglyphea, D. eurocapillaria, D. faceta, D. itylus, D. meekana, D. nyi, D. quadrilineata, D. quasicapillaria, D. reticulatus, D. scitula, D. subcancellata, D. transcostata, D. wortheni, D. yochelsoni
Synonymy list
| Year | Name and author |
|---|---|
| 1945 | Dictyotomaria Knight p. 576 |
| 1960 | Glyptotomaria (Dictyotomaria) Knight et al. p. 214 |
| 1967 | Glyptotomaria (Dictyotomaria) Yochelson and Saunders p. 71 |
| 1997 | Glyptotomaria (Dictyotomaria) Hoare et al. p. 1031 |
| 2002 | Dictyotomaria Sepkoski, Jr. |
| 2003 | Dictyotomaria Amler and Heidelberger p. 1165 |
| 2009 | Dictyotomaria Bandel p. 7 |
| 2017 | Dictyotomaria Wagner p. G302 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available