Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Included Taxa
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Potamotherium hasnoti

Mammalia - Carnivora

Taxonomy
Potamotherium hasnoti was named by Pilgrim (1913). Its type specimen is GSI-D 135, a set of teeth ( right mandibular ramus contain- ing p4 and m1), and it is a 3D body fossil.

It was recombined as Vishnuictis hasnoti by Sankhyan et al. (2025).

Synonymy list
YearName and author
1913Potamotherium hasnoti Pilgrim
2025Vishnuictis hasnoti Sankhyan et al. p. 13

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Bilateria
EubilateriaAx 1987
Deuterostomia
phylumChordataHaeckel 1874
subphylumVertebrata
superclassGnathostomata
Osteichthyes()
subclassSarcopterygii()
subclassDipnotetrapodomorpha(Nelson 2006)
subclassTetrapodomorpha()
Tetrapoda
Reptiliomorpha
Anthracosauria
subclassAmphibiosauriaKuhn 1967
Cotylosauria()
Amniota
subclassSynapsida
Therapsida()
infraorderCynodontia()
Mammaliamorpha
Mammaliaformes
RankNameAuthor
classMammalia
Cladotheria
Zatheria
subclassTribosphenida()
subclassTheria
Eutheria()
Placentalia
Boreoeutheria
Laurasiatheria
Scrotifera
Ferae()
Pancarnivora
CarnivoramorphaWyss and Flynn 1993
CarnivoraformesFlynn et al.
orderCarnivora
suborderCaniformiaKretzoi 1943
infraorderCanoidea(Simpson 1931)
superfamilyArctoideaFlower 1869
PanpinnipediaWolsan et al. 2020
genusPotamotheriumGeoffroy 1833
specieshasnotiPilgrim 1913

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

Potamotherium hasnoti Pilgrim 1913
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
ReferenceDiagnosis
A. R. Sankhyan et al. 2025Vishnuictis (as defined by Werdelin and Pei-
gné 2010) with stoutly built mandible, deeper than the length
of m1; m1 broadest in the middle, tapering mesially (ante-
riorly); with talonid only two-thirds the mesiodistal length
of the trigonid and much narrower; protoconid extremely
high; paraconid much lower; metaconid lower than para-
conid, situated on the same level as the protoconid and
partially connected to it by a transverse ridge; talonid not
basin-shaped, with a low, crenulated, somewhat trenchant
hypoconid; entoconid rim not markedly developed except at
the extreme distolingual (posterolingual) corner; p4 rather
elongate, more than two-thirds the length of m1 with a
high main cuspid, a rudimentary mesial cuspid, a distinct
posterior cuspid and a strong distal cingulum particularly
prominent at the distolingual (posterolingual) corner (see
Pilgrim 1932).