Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Ganguroo
Taxonomy
Ganguroo was named by Cooke (1997). It was considered monophyletic by Travouillon et al. (2014).
It was assigned to Bulungamayinae by Cooke (1997); to Macropodoidea by Myers et al. (2001); and to Macropodidae by Travouillon et al. (2014), Cooke et al. (2015).
It was assigned to Bulungamayinae by Cooke (1997); to Macropodoidea by Myers et al. (2001); and to Macropodidae by Travouillon et al. (2014), Cooke et al. (2015).
Species
Synonymy list
Year | Name and author |
---|---|
1997 | Ganguroo Cooke |
2001 | Ganguroo Myers et al. p. 148 |
2014 | Ganguroo Travouillon et al. |
2015 | Ganguroo Cooke et al. |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
G. †Ganguroo Cooke 1997
show all | hide all
†Ganguroo bilamina Cooke 1997
†Ganguroo bites Travouillon et al. 2014 [kangaroo]
†Ganguroo robustiter Cooke et al. 2015
Diagnosis
Reference | Diagnosis | |
---|---|---|
K. J. Travouillon et al. 2014 | Species of Ganguroo differ from all hypsiprimnodontids and potoroines by having bilophodont molars and m4 is not greatly reduced in size relative to other molars. They differ from all macropodines and sthenurines by having a combination of: a buccally expanded masseteric canal; a sharp ventrally convex dentary margin below m1-2; i1 with enamel confined to the buccal surface and extensive on that surface; ventral and dorsal flanges present on i1; p3 and P3 elongate with fine transcristids and a bulbous base; a small precingulid present anterobuccal to the paracristid; lower molars and dp3 bilophodont. It differs from balbarids in lacking a posterior cingulid on any lower molars and m1 lacks a protostylid (Kear and Cooke, 2001). |