Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Included Taxa
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Krabia

Mammalia - Primates - Amphipithecidae

Taxonomy
Krabia was named by Chaimanee et al. (2013). Its type is Krabia minuta.

It was assigned to Amphipithecidae by Chaimanee et al. (2013).

Species
K. minuta (type species)

Synonymy list
YearName and author
2013Krabia Chaimanee et al.

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Bilateria
EubilateriaAx 1987
Deuterostomia
phylumChordataHaeckel 1874
subphylumVertebrata
superclassGnathostomata
Osteichthyes()
subclassSarcopterygii()
subclassDipnotetrapodomorpha(Nelson 2006)
subclassTetrapodomorpha()
Tetrapoda
Reptiliomorpha
Anthracosauria
subclassAmphibiosauriaKuhn 1967
Cotylosauria()
Amniota
subclassSynapsida
Therapsida()
RankNameAuthor
infraorderCynodontia()
Mammaliamorpha
Mammaliaformes
classMammalia
Cladotheria
Zatheria
subclassTribosphenida()
subclassTheria
Eutheria()
Placentalia
Boreoeutheria
EuarchontogliresMurphy et al. 2001
Euarchonta
orderPrimates
infraorderHaplorhini(Pocock 1918)
Anthropoidea(Mivart 1864)
familyAmphipithecidae(Godinot 1994)
genusKrabia

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

G. †Krabia Chaimanee et al. 2013
show all | hide all
Krabia minuta Chaimanee et al. 2013
Diagnosis
ReferenceDiagnosis
Y. Chaimanee et al. 2013Small amphipithecid anthropoid primates, similar in size to Phenacopithecus, much smaller than other Eocene amphipithecid primates. Characterized by subtriangular upper molars having rounded corners, upper molars unwaisted, bunodont, low and vertical cusps, closed trigon, smooth enamel, absence of buccal cingulum, hypocone, peri- cone and conules, very strong and complete lingual cingulum, weak parastyle and metastyle, and M2 buccal wall oblique with paracone more expanded buccally than metacone.
Differs from other amphipithecids (Siamopithecus, Pon- daungia, Ganlea, Myanmarpithecus and Bugtipithecus) by the absence of buccal cingulum, hypocone, pericone and conules, presence of strong and complete lingual cingulum, smooth enamel, closed trigon, and weak parastyle and metastyle.
Differs from eosimiiforms (Eosimias, Phenacopithecus, Bahi- nia, Phileosimias and Afrasia) by its broad and unwaisted upper molars, low cusp relief, absence of buccal cingulum and conules, more buccal position of its paracone and meta- cone, weak parastyle and metastyle, strong and complete lingual cingulum and smaller trigon.
Differs from omomyids and tarsiids by less triangular shape of molar, no buccal cingulum, and no hypocone and conules.
Differs from sivaladapids (Guangxilemur and Hoangho- nius) by the absence of buccal cingulum, buccal shearing crests, mesostyle, hypocone, pericone and conules, weak parastyle and closed trigon.
Measurements
No measurements are available
Composition: phosphaticsubp
Environment: terrestrialsubc
Locomotion: actively mobilec
Life habit: arborealo
Diet: omnivoreo
Reproduction: viviparoussubc
Created: 2005-08-26 13:27:51
Modified: 2005-08-26 15:27:51
Source: o = order, subc = subclass, c = class, subp = subphylum
References: Ji et al. 2002, Lillegraven 1979, Nowak 1999, Carroll 1988, Hendy et al. 2009

Age range: Late/Upper Eocene or 37.20000 to 33.90000 Ma

Collections: one only


Time interval Ma Country or state Original ID and collection number
Late/Upper Eocene37.2 - 33.9Thailand K. minutua (13127)