Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Taxonomy
Nothocyon geismarianus mollis was named by Merriam (1906). Its type specimen is UCMP 90, a partial skull (skull with I3 broken–C, P1 broken, and P2–M2), and it is a 3D body fossil.
It was recombined as Leptocyon mollis by Merriam (1906), Wang et al. (2008), Tedford et al. (2009).
It was recombined as Leptocyon mollis by Merriam (1906), Wang et al. (2008), Tedford et al. (2009).
Synonymy list
Year | Name and author |
---|---|
1906 | Leptocyon mollis Merriam p. 13 figs. pl. 2, fig. 1 and pl. 3, fig. 1 |
1906 | Nothocyon geismarianus mollis Merriam p. 13 figs. PI. 2, Fig. 1, and PL 3, Fig. 1 |
2008 | Leptocyon mollis Wang et al. |
2009 | Leptocyon mollis Tedford et al. p. 18 figs. Figures 3, 5, 6H–J; appendices 2, 3 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
†Nothocyon geismarianus mollis Merriam 1906
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
Reference | Diagnosis | |
---|---|---|
J. C. Merriam 1906 | L. mollis differs from L. douglassi in its larger size and propor- tionally larger M1 and M2 (fig. 5); from L. vulpinus it differs in its smaller and lower crowned premolars; from L. gregorii it differs in its wider palate, backward direct- ed, more robust, and salient paroccipital process, in larger and lower crowned P3, in more robust P4 with relatively larger and more anteriorly situated protocone and proportionally larger M1 with more prominent cingulum and slightly stronger para- style, and in proportionally larger M2 that bears a metaconule. |
Measurements
No measurements are available
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|||||
|
|
||||
Source: o = order, subc = subclass, c = class, subp = subphylum | |||||
References: Ji et al. 2002, Carroll 1988, Nowak 1999, Hendy et al. 2009, Lillegraven 1979 |
Collections
No collection or age range data are available