Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Asperophyllum
Taxonomy
Asperophyllum was named by Spasskiy (1964) [Sepkoski's age data: S Ldov-u D Eife-u]. It is not extant.
It was assigned to Cystiphyllidae by Hill (1981); and to Rugosa by Sepkoski (2002).
It was assigned to Cystiphyllidae by Hill (1981); and to Rugosa by Sepkoski (2002).
Synonyms
|
Synonymy list
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
G. †Asperophyllum Spasskiy 1964
show all | hide all
Invalid names: Kymocystis Strelnikov 1968 [synonym]
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available
Measurements
No measurements are available
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Source: o = order, c = class | |||||
Reference: Kiessling 2004 |
Age range: Wenlock or 433.40000 to 427.40000 Ma
Collections (6 total)
Time interval | Ma | Country or state | Original ID and collection number |
---|---|---|---|
Wenlock | Russian Federation (Yakutiya) | Kymocystis papillaris (79530 79532) | |
Wenlock | Russian Federation (Siberia) | Kymocystis notabilis (206378 206379 206380 206381) |