Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Bonitasaura
Taxonomy
Bonitasaura was named by Apesteguía (2004). It was considered monophyletic by Gallina and Apesteguía (2011).
It was assigned to Nemegtosauridae by Wilson (2005), Avilla et al. (2005); to Titanosauria by Apesteguía (2004), Mannion and Calvo (2011); to Titanosauroidea by Gallina and Apesteguía (2011), Gallina and Apesteguía (2015); to Lithostrotia by González Riga and Ortiz David (2014), Páramo et al. (2020); and to Eutitanosauria by Carballido et al. (2017), Navarro et al. (2022).
It was assigned to Nemegtosauridae by Wilson (2005), Avilla et al. (2005); to Titanosauria by Apesteguía (2004), Mannion and Calvo (2011); to Titanosauroidea by Gallina and Apesteguía (2011), Gallina and Apesteguía (2015); to Lithostrotia by González Riga and Ortiz David (2014), Páramo et al. (2020); and to Eutitanosauria by Carballido et al. (2017), Navarro et al. (2022).
Species
Synonymy list
Year | Name and author |
---|---|
2004 | Bonitasaura Apesteguía p. 493 |
2005 | Bonitasaura Avilla et al. p. 43 |
2005 | Bonitasaura Wilson p. 313 |
2011 | Bonitasaura Gallina and Apesteguía |
2011 | Bonitasaura Mannion and Calvo |
2014 | Bonitasaura González Riga and Ortiz David |
2015 | Bonitasaura Gallina and Apesteguía p. 2 |
2017 | Bonitasaura Carballido et al. |
2020 | Bonitasaura Páramo et al. p. 373 |
2022 | Bonitasaura Navarro et al. p. 344 fig. 13 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available
Measurements
No measurements are available
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Source: infrao = infraorder | |||||
References: Kiessling 2004, Marsh 1875 |