Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Included Taxa
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Leptophoca proxima

Osteichthyes - Carnivora - Phocidae

Taxonomy
Prophoca proxima was named by Van Beneden (1876) [No type specimen number listed by Van Beneden (1876). Koretsky (2001) lists the lectotype. IRSN = Institute Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Brussels, Belgium]. Its type specimen is IRSN 1146 Ct. M 279, a limb element (humerus), and it is a 3D body fossil. Its type locality is Vieux-Dieu, which is in a Langhian/Serravallian open shallow subtidal sandstone in the Berchem Formation of Belgium.

It was recombined as Leptophoca proxima by Ray (1976), Dewaele et al. (2017), Berta et al. (2018), Kienle and Berta (2019), Berta et al. (2022), Rule and Park (2024).

Synonyms
Synonymy list
YearName and author
1874Prophoca proxima Vanden Broeck p. 199
1876Prophoca proxima Van Beneden p. 802
1898Prophoca proxima Trouessart p. 382
1904Prophoca proxima Trouessart p. 285
1906Leptophoca lenis True p. 836 figs. Plate LXXV
1922Prophoca proxima Kellogg p. 116
1922Leptophoca lenis Kellogg p. 123
1930Leptophoca lenis Hay p. 562
1947Monatherium (Leptophoca) lenis Friant p. 6
1947Prophoca proxima Friant p. 7
1976Leptophoca proxima Ray p. 394
2001Prophoca proxima Koretsky p. 61
2001Leptophoca lenis Koretsky p. 62
2003Leptophoca lenis Deméré et al. p. 49 figs. Fig. 3.3
2008Leptophoca lenis Koretsky and Barnes p. 547
2012Leptophoca lenis Koretsky et al. p. 5
2017Leptophoca proxima Dewaele et al. p. 25
2018Leptophoca proxima Berta et al. p. 210 figs. Fig. 2
2019Leptophoca proxima Kienle and Berta
2022Leptophoca proxima Berta et al. p. 7 figs. Table 1.1
2023Leptophoca lenis Hafed et al.
2024Leptophoca proxima Rule and Park p. 10 figs. Table 2

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Bilateria
EubilateriaAx 1987
Deuterostomia
phylumChordataHaeckel 1874
subphylumVertebrata
superclassGnathostomata
classOsteichthyes
subclassSarcopterygii()
subclassDipnotetrapodomorpha(Nelson 2006)
subclassTetrapodomorpha()
Tetrapoda
Reptiliomorpha
Anthracosauria
subclassAmphibiosauriaKuhn 1967
Cotylosauria()
Amniota
subclassSynapsida
Therapsida()
infraorderCynodontia()
Mammaliamorpha
Mammaliaformes
classMammalia
Cladotheria
RankNameAuthor
Zatheria
subclassTribosphenida()
subclassTheria
Eutheria()
Placentalia
Boreoeutheria
Laurasiatheria
Scrotifera
Ferae()
Pancarnivora
CarnivoramorphaWyss and Flynn 1993
CarnivoraformesFlynn et al.
orderCarnivora
suborderCaniformiaKretzoi 1943
infraorderCanoidea(Simpson 1931)
superfamilyArctoideaFlower 1869
PanpinnipediaWolsan et al. 2020
Pinnipedimorpha
Pinnipedia()
familyPhocidae()
subfamilyPhocinae
genusLeptophoca
speciesproxima()

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

Leptophoca proxima Van Beneden 1876
show all | hide all
Invalid names: Leptophoca lenis True 1906 [synonym]
Diagnosis
ReferenceDiagnosis
I. A. Koretsky et al. 2012 (Leptophoca lenis)Phocine of medium size. Greater trochanter of femur
higher than head, its proximal part wider than its distal; distinct lesser trochanter located far below distal border of greater trochanter; trochanteric fossa deep, wide, and overhang- ing medioproximally; head large in relation
to size of femur; minimum width of diaphysis situated proximally.
L. Dewaele et al. 2017Large phocine, similar in size to large E. barbatus. The humerus of Leptophoca proxima differs from all other phocines in the following unique combination of characters: lesser tubercle of humerus small not reaching the proximal level of the humeral capitulum (also present in Praepusa vindobonensis, Prophoca rousseaui and
S. sintsovi); intertubercular groove wide and shallow (also present in C. cristata,
E. barbatus and Prophoca rousseaui); relatively straight posterior margin of the humeral capitulum; deltopectoral crest extending along the proximal two-third of humerus
(also present in C. maeotica, Phoca vitulinoides, Prae. vindobonensis, Prophoca rousseaui and S. sintsovi); deltopectoral crest terminating abruptly, distally, but less abrupt than in extant Phocinae (also present in Prophoca rousseaui); deltopectoral crest mediolaterally thin; lateral epicondyle thin and strongly projecting posteriorly; deep and well-outlined coronoid fossa (also present in Phoca spp. and Pusa spp.)
Koretsky (2001) presented a diagnosis of the cranium and mandible of Leptophoca proxima (as Leptophoca lenis). However, this diagnosis is based on isolated skulls and skull fragments and mandibles. Without any supported association to Leptophoca proxima, i.e., association with the humerus, the designation of any cranial or mandibular specimen to Leptophoca proxima remains doubtful. Therefore, we acknowledge the diagnosis by Koretsky (2001), but neither accept nor reject it. Similarly, Koretsky (2001) tentatively assigned a significant number of isolated postcranial bones to Leptophoca proxima. However, given the abundance of humeri from the Calvert Formation and other formations of the Chesapeake Group (Neogene of the mid-Atlantic coastal plain, Delaware, Maryland, North Carolina, and Virginia) assigned to Leptophoca proxima, it can relatively safely be assumed that other phocine bones that have been found in relatively large numbers in the Chesapeake Group, such as femora and tibiae, can be related to Leptophoca proxima as well. Nevertheless, no femora or tibiae from the Neogene of Belgium can be assigned to Leptophoca proxima. Hence, because the current study focuses on material from Belgium, neither the femur nor the tibia of Leptophoca proxima will be treated in detail here.
Measurements
No measurements are available
Composition: hydroxyapatiteuc
Ontogeny: modification of partsuc
Environment: marineuc
Locomotion: actively mobilec
Life habit: amphibiousuc
Diet: piscivoref
Diet 2: carnivoref
Reproduction: viviparousuc
Created: 2005-06-08 10:11:09
Modified: 2005-06-08 12:11:09
Source: f = family, c = class, uc = unranked clade
References: Carreño and Cronin 1993, Nowak 1991, Gingerich 2003, Hendy et al. 2009

Age range: base of the Burdigalian to the top of the Pliocene or 20.45000 to 2.58000 Ma

Collections (33 total)


Time interval Ma Country or state Original ID and collection number
Burdigalian20.45 - 15.98USA (Delaware) Leptophoca lenis (18579)
Burdigalian20.45 - 15.98Netherlands (Noord-Brabant) Leptophoca amphiatlantica (123486)
Langhian15.98 - 13.82USA (Virginia) Leptophoca lenis (28368)
Langhian15.98 - 13.82USA (Maryland) Leptophoca lenis (18516 45506 70818 71615 71809) Leptophoca lenis, Leptophoca amphiatlantica (70823)
Langhian - Serravallian15.98 - 11.63Belgium (Antwerpen) Prophoca proxima (type locality: 51680)
Langhian - Serravallian15.98 - 11.63Belgium Prophoca proxima (59123)
Serravallian13.82 - 11.63USA (Virginia) Leptophoca lenis (55690 57111 71798 71806 126605 187324) Leptophoca lenis, Leptophoca amphiatlantica (45508)
Serravallian13.82 - 11.63USA (Maryland) Leptophoca lenis (49945 70828 70835 70836 70843 70854 88577 88578 88581 88582)
Tortonian11.63 - 7.246Belgium (Antwerpen) Prophoca proxima (52049 66960)
Tortonian11.63 - 7.246USA (Maryland) Leptophoca amphiatlantica (123487)
Tortonian - Messinian11.63 - 5.333Belgium (Antwerpen) Prophoca proxima (67022)
Pliocene5.333 - 2.58USA (North Carolina) Leptophoca lenis (123861)