Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Elmisaurinae (disused)
Taxonomy
Elmisaurinae was named by Currie (2000). It was considered monophyletic by Currie (2000).
It was assigned to Caenagnathidae by Currie (2000) and Funston et al. (2016).
It was assigned to Caenagnathidae by Currie (2000) and Funston et al. (2016).
Synonymy list
Year | Name and author |
---|---|
2000 | Elmisaurinae Currie pp. 438-439 |
2016 | Elmisaurinae Funston et al. p. 161 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
Subfm. †Elmisaurinae Currie 2000
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available
Measurements
No measurements are available
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Source: infrao = infraorder, o = order | |||||
References: Marsh 1875, Averianov and Yarkov 2004 |
Collections
No collection or age range data are available