Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Included Taxa
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Megalictis ferox

Mammalia - Carnivora - Mustelidae

Taxonomy
Megalictis ferox was named by Matthew (1907) [genotype]. Its type locality is AMNH Rosebud 22, which is in a Harrisonian terrestrial horizon in the Rosebud Formation of South Dakota.

Synonymy list
YearName and author
1907Megalictis ferox Matthew
2016Megalictis ferox Valenciano et al. p. 6

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Bilateria
EubilateriaAx 1987
Deuterostomia
phylumChordataHaeckel 1874
subphylumVertebrata
superclassGnathostomata
Osteichthyes()
subclassSarcopterygii()
subclassDipnotetrapodomorpha(Nelson 2006)
subclassTetrapodomorpha()
Tetrapoda
Reptiliomorpha
Anthracosauria
subclassAmphibiosauriaKuhn 1967
Cotylosauria()
Amniota
subclassSynapsida
Therapsida()
infraorderCynodontia()
Mammaliamorpha
Mammaliaformes
RankNameAuthor
classMammalia
Cladotheria
Zatheria
subclassTribosphenida()
subclassTheria
Eutheria()
Placentalia
Boreoeutheria
Laurasiatheria
Scrotifera
Ferae()
CarnivoramorphaWyss and Flynn 1993
CarnivoraformesFlynn et al.
orderCarnivora
suborderCaniformiaKretzoi 1943
infraorderCanoidea(Simpson 1931)
superfamilyArctoideaFlower 1869
Mustelida
familyMustelidaeFischer 1817
subfamilyOligobuninae
genusMegalictis
speciesferox

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

Megalictis ferox Matthew 1907
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
ReferenceDiagnosis
A. Valenciano et al. 2016Megalictis ferox differs from M. simplicidens, M. frazieri, “M.” petersoni and Oligobunis crassivultus in its larger size, m1 without metaconid and m1 talonid with a closed lingual morphology with a lingual cingulum between the metacristid and entocristid. Additionally, it differs from M. simplicidens and M. frazieri in having a higher and more robust mandibular symphysis, a reduced p2 and a more robust p4 and m1. It further differs from “M.” petersoni in much larger size and p3–4 with mesial accessory cuspids. It further differs from Oligobunis crassivultus in having a more rectangular P2, smaller M1 than P4, enlarged M1 stylar area, higher paracone than metacone on the M1, reduced p2, p2–3 high-crowned distal ci gula, more developed p3 distal accessory cuspid, relatively enlarged p4, and higher protoconid than paraconid on the m1.