| Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
| Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Camponotites induratus
Taxonomy
Formica indurata was named by Heer (1849). Its type specimen is UMJG&P 77.632, an exoskeleton, and it is an impression. Its type locality is Radoboj (Grätz Collection), which is in a Sarmatian lagoonal/restricted shallow subtidal limestone in Croatia.
It was recombined as Camponotus induratus by Mayr (1867), Bolton (2012), Dlussky and Putyatina (2014); it was recombined as Camponotites induratus by Boudinot et al. (2024).
It was recombined as Camponotus induratus by Mayr (1867), Bolton (2012), Dlussky and Putyatina (2014); it was recombined as Camponotites induratus by Boudinot et al. (2024).
Synonyms
|
Synonymy list
| Year | Name and author |
|---|---|
| 1849 | Formica indurata Heer p. 116 figs. Pl 11, fig 2 |
| 1849 | Formica pinguicula radobojana Heer p. 118 figs. Pl 9, fig 9 |
| 1867 | Formica indurata Heer p. 9 figs. Pl 1, figs 6a,b |
| 1867 | Camponotus induratus Mayr p. 52 |
| 2012 | Camponotus induratus Bolton |
| 2014 | Camponotus induratus Dlussky and Putyatina p. 249 figs. 4B-E, 17D |
| 2024 | Camponotites induratus Boudinot et al. p. 145 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
†Camponotites induratus Heer 1849
show all | hide all
†Formica pinguicula radobojana Heer 1849
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available
Measurements
No measurements are available
|
|
||||
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Source: c = class, p = phylum | |||||
| References: Kiessling 2004, Bush and Bambach 2015 | |||||