| Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
| Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Camponotus
Taxonomy
Camponotus was named by Mayr (1861). It is extant.
It was assigned to Formicidae by Scudder (1877), Pongrácz (1931); to Myrmicinae by Hong and Wang (1985); to Formicinae by Dlussky (1981), Solórzano Kraemer (2007), Dlussky and Perfilieva (2014); and to Camponotini by Wheeler (1915), Bolton (2003), Bolton (2012), Ward et al. (2016).
It was assigned to Formicidae by Scudder (1877), Pongrácz (1931); to Myrmicinae by Hong and Wang (1985); to Formicinae by Dlussky (1981), Solórzano Kraemer (2007), Dlussky and Perfilieva (2014); and to Camponotini by Wheeler (1915), Bolton (2003), Bolton (2012), Ward et al. (2016).
Synonymy list
| Year | Name and author |
|---|---|
| 1861 | Camponotus Mayr |
| 1877 | Camponotus Scudder p. 742 |
| 1915 | Camponotus Wheeler |
| 1931 | Camponotus Pongrácz p. 114 |
| 1981 | Camponotus Dlussky |
| 1985 | Camponotus Hong and Wang p. 20 |
| 2003 | Camponotus Bolton p. 27 |
| 2007 | Camponotus Solórzano Kraemer p. 39 |
| 2012 | Camponotus Bolton |
| 2014 | Camponotus Dlussky and Perfilieva p. 418 |
| 2016 | Camponotus Ward et al. p. 345 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
G. Camponotus Mayr 1861
show all | hide all
Camponotus festinatus Buckley 1866
Camponotus festinus Smith 1857
Camponotus herculeanus Linnaeus 1758
Camponotus luteus Smith 1858
Camponotus mitis Smith 1892
†Camponotus oeningensis Heer 1849
†Camponotus parvus Perfilieva 2022
†Camponotus pinguiculus Heer 1849
†Formica pinguicula oeningensis Heer 1849
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available
Measurements
No measurements are available
|
|
||||
|
|||||
|
|
||||
| Source: c = class, p = phylum | |||||
| References: Bush and Bambach 2015, Kiessling 2004 | |||||
Age range
Maximum range based only on fossils: base of the MP 11 to the top of the Holocene or 48.07000 to 0.00000 Ma
Minimum age of oldest fossil (stem group age): 41.03 Ma
Minimum age of oldest fossil (stem group age): 41.03 Ma
Collections (29 total)
| Time interval | Ma | Country or state | Original ID and collection number |
|---|---|---|---|
| MP 11 | Germany (Hessen) | C. sp. (120798) | |
| Chattian | Russian Federation | C. parvus (125971) | |
| Early/Lower Miocene | Mexico (Chiapas) | C. sp. (153340) | |
| Early/Lower Miocene | Mexico | C. sp. (21977) | |
| Burdigalian | Japan (Gifu) | C. sp. (181074) | |
| Burdigalian | China (Shandong) | C. festinus (128552) C. mitis (128550) C. mitis, C. luteus (128551) | |
| Burdigalian | Austria | C. sp. (139942) | |
| Langhian | USA (Idaho) | C. sp. (97616) | |
| Langhian | China (Fujian) | C. sp. (220273) | |
| Middle Miocene - Late/Upper Miocene | Kyrgyzstan | C. sp. (138754 138758) | |
| Sarmatian | Germany (Baden-Württemberg) | Formica pinguicula (113689 115304) | |
| Sarmatian | Croatia | C. sp. (117247) | |
| Messinian | USA (Alaska) | C. sp. (123352) | |
| Piacenzian | Germany | C. sp. (164952) | |
| Piacenzian | Germany (Niedersachsen) | C. sp. (109196) | |
| Gelasian | Greenland | C. herculeanus (160145 160159 160163) C. spp., C. herculeanus (160109 160144) | |
| Chibanian | Japan | C. sp. (194482 211426) | |
| Holocene | Tanzania | C. sp. (234540) | |
| Holocene | Colombia (Santander) | C. sp. (213295) | |
| Holocene | Colombia (Boyacá) | C. sp. (215881) |