Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Taxonomy
Phoca pontica was named by Eichwald (1850) [MPGI, Paleontological Museum of the Mining Institute, Saint-Petersburg, Russia:this is a neotype designated by Koretsky (2001).]. Its type specimen is MPGI 17-113, a limb element (left humerus), and it is a 3D body fossil. It is the type species of Monachopsis.
It was recombined as Phoca (Phoca) pontica by Trouessart (1898); it was recombined as Monachus (Monachus) ponticus by Friant (1947); it was recombined as Phoca (Pusa) pontica by McLaren (1960); it was recombined as Pusa pontica by Scheffer (1967); it was considered a nomen dubium by Rule and Park (2024); it was recombined as Monachopsis pontica by Kretzoi (1941), Koretsky (1991), Koretsky (2001), Koretsky and Barnes (2006), Berta et al. (2022), Otriazhyi et al. (2025).
It was recombined as Phoca (Phoca) pontica by Trouessart (1898); it was recombined as Monachus (Monachus) ponticus by Friant (1947); it was recombined as Phoca (Pusa) pontica by McLaren (1960); it was recombined as Pusa pontica by Scheffer (1967); it was considered a nomen dubium by Rule and Park (2024); it was recombined as Monachopsis pontica by Kretzoi (1941), Koretsky (1991), Koretsky (2001), Koretsky and Barnes (2006), Berta et al. (2022), Otriazhyi et al. (2025).
Synonymy list
Year | Name and author |
---|---|
1850 | Phoca pontica Eichwald p. 210 figs. Plate 13 |
1860 | Phoca pontica Nordmann p. 321 |
1898 | Phoca (Phoca) pontica Trouessart p. 385 |
1904 | Phoca pontica Trouessart p. 286 |
1922 | Phoca pontica Kellogg p. 120 |
1924 | Phoca pontica Alekseev p. 27 |
1925 | Phoca pontica Alekseev p. 138 |
1925 | Phoca pontica Zittel p. 78 |
1927 | Phoca pontica Bogachev p. 140 |
1931 | Phoca pontica Simionescu p. 186 |
1941 | Monachopsis pontica Kretzoi p. 277 |
1944 | Phoca pontica Macarovici p. 136 |
1947 | Monachus (Monachus) ponticus Friant p. 6 |
1960 | Phoca (Pusa) pontica McLaren p. 57 |
1967 | Pusa pontica Scheffer p. 355 |
1991 | Monachopsis pontica Koretsky p. 41A |
2001 | Monachopsis pontica Koretsky p. 39 |
2006 | Monachopsis pontica Koretsky and Barnes p. 148 |
2022 | Monachopsis pontica Berta et al. p. 7 figs. Table 1.1 |
2025 | Monachopsis pontica Otriazhyi et al. p. 8 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
†Monachopsis pontica Eichwald 1850
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
Reference | Diagnosis | |
---|---|---|
P. Otriazhyi et al. 2025 | Monachopsis pontica differs from all known phocine seals by having a thin posterior part of the nasal (as wide as 7.5% of the rostral width); an elongated maxillary part of the rostrum with a DNFO/RH ratio
of about 195% (distance from nasal foramen to orbit/height of the rostrum at the rostral edge of the nasal; see figure 1); and a ventral edge of the zygomatic arch in anterior view situated higher than the alveolar plane (rather than a level with that plane). Also, it is distinct in a very long deltoid crest of the humerus reaching the coronoid fossa [11]. The long deltoid crest is shared only by several Monachinae seals such as ‘Virginiaphoca magurai’ (holotype humerus USNM 639750), ‘Auroraphoca atlantica’ (holotype humerus USNM 181419), and Homiphoca, and a phocine seal Cryptophoca maeotica (humerus NMNHU-P 64-530), from the Paratethys as well. M. pontica has a distally (rather than proximally) situated pronator teres process of the radius. Also, Monachopsis pontica differs from all known phocine seals except H. fasciata in pm4 size, which is about equal to m1. Further, it differs from all known phocine seals except H. fasciata and Pusa sibirica by having a swollen palatal process of the maxilla [11]. It differs from all phocine seals except H. fasciata, Pagophilus groenlandicus, and Erignathus barbatus in a greater tubercle of the humerus higher than a head (see also [11]). Meanwhile, M. pontica shares the following synapomorphies with crown phocine seals, differing herewith from all the known Neogene phocines: strong inflation of a tympanic bulla; a lesser tubercle of the humerus higher than a head (see also [11]); a strongly twisted wing of the ilium (not shared by Cystophora cristata and E. barbatus); and a strongly reduced intertrochanteric crest of the femur (not shared by E. barbatus). New findings show that the PM4 and M1 are double-rooted, and the diastema between them is present (the observation differs from diagnoses made by [11]). |
Measurements
No measurements are available
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|||||
|
|
||||
Source: f = family, c = class, uc = unranked clade | |||||
References: Nowak 1991, Hendy et al. 2009, Carreño and Cronin 1993, Gingerich 2003 |
Collections (21 total)
Time interval | Ma | Country or state | Original ID and collection number |
---|---|---|---|
Serravallian | Moldova (Strashensky) | Monachopsis pontica (60266) | |
Serravallian | Romania | Monachopsis pontica (60280) | |
Serravallian | Ukraine (Cherson) | Monachopsis pontica (60258) Phoca sp. (60249) | |
Serravallian | Ukraine (Crimea) | Monachopsis pontica (60244 240030) | |
Serravallian | Ukraine (Zaporozhye) | Monachopsis pontica (60240) | |
Serravallian | Ukraine (Donetsk) | Phoca sp. (60238) | |
Serravallian | Moldova (Chișinău) | Phoca pontica (210590) | |
Sarmatian | Russian Federation | Phoca pontica (73903) | |
Sarmatian | Ukraine (Crimea) | Monachopsis pontica (60248 239966 240018 240019) | |
Sarmatian | Moldova | Monachopsis pontica (57734) | |
Sarmatian | Türkiye | Phoca pontica (56563) | |
Sarmatian | Russian Federation (Adygea) | Monachopsis pontica (207770) | |
Tortonian | Ukraine | Monachopsis pontica (239965) Phoca pontica (88545) | |
Tortonian | Ukraine (Crimea) | Phoca pontica (85514) | |
Calabrian | Azerbaijan | Phoca pontica (59668) |